This is going to be a short article, as it’s nothing we haven’t seen time and time again, but people deserve to know the truth each time it comes back around. You see, just recently Kotaku wrote an article titled “What is Richard Dawkins: Evolution?” in which they refused to disclose their relation with their topic. As a matter of fact, one viewer by the name of Douglas responded to their lack of disclosure, pointing out that the writer of the article is a Backer of the game that the article talks about.

Since then, Kotaku has removed the post without response, but the writer, Richard Stanton, has not placed the disclaimer. The comments are now full of people pointing out that they deleted the comment, thereby going far beyond the original breach of ethical journalism. This is very well a break in the SPJ Code of Ethics. According to the Code of Ethics, one should Act Independently, and that they should avoid any conflicts of interest (real or perceived). In other words, the writer should disclose any unavoidable conflicts.

what is richard dawkins evolution rich stanton kotaku comments

“Join the Discussion” Indeed…

Here’s where my problem lies: it’s not that big of a deal to place a disclaimer or a disclosure. Personally, I try to put one at the end of all my articles, even if I don’t feel that whatever I listed is strong enough of a connection to warrant one, thereby covering the “real or perceived” ruling of the Code of Ethics. But what is it that makes Richard Stanton think that adding a simple disclosure of his Backer status will weaken his argument? If he believes in the potential of the game in question, then his status as a Backer should only enhance his argument to his audience. The idea that he believes the game is worth his time, and his money would make the audience more coerced into supporting the game.

While this can be considered a lapse in judgement by the writer, however, Stanton has written three articles total regarding the game of which none contain a disclosure. According to Kotaku’s Policy of Reporting, a writer may only be permitted to pay into a “Patreon or any other crowd-funding service in the extremely unlikely scenario when it is the only way to access a game we’re interested in for coverage.” As such, it also breaks Kotaku’s Policy for him to participate in crowd-funding for a game that Richard Stanton is covering.

Now, many readers may see this as only a violation of Kotaku’s reporting policy and not so much as a conflict of interest otherwise. However, if the writer, or by extension his editor, believed that it was not a violation of journalistic ethics, there would be no reason for Douglas’ comment to be deleted in the first place. If the argument could be otherwise defended, they could explain to the reader why there was no conflict of interest or break in their reporting policy. The deletion of this comment makes me believe that they (be it Richard Stanton, his editor, or both) know that they did something wrong and are trying to cover up their wrongdoing…So I truly hope that in the future, Kotaku and their writers can avoid situations such as this by simply following the Code of Ethics.

And with that said, what’s your take on this matter? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section down below!

Credit:
Robin Ek – Editor

Source:
Kotaku’s Policy
Code of Ethics
Stanton’s article with missing comment
KiA article with full list of articles without disclosure
Douglas

***Disclaimer***
This is a personal opinion of the writer, and it doesn’t necessarily represent the other writers’ (nor The Gaming Ground´s) opinions.

***Disclosure***
I am no fan of Kotaku or Richard Stanton. I may have a negative bias against them, and as such that should be taken into consideration in relation to the point of my article. I am a supporter of #GamerGate and as such hold the SPJ Code of Ethics in a high regard.

tgg author avatar Jay Shay
Justin Easler
Senior editor
The Gaming Ground
Twitter: @masterjayshay

Related Posts


More by Justin Easler:

Tags: , , , , ,

EwinRacing Calling Series Gaming Chairs

Save 3$ with our Play-Asia coupon code "thegg"

13 Comments ON " Richard Stanton breaks code of ethics and Kotaku h... "
  • DukeMagus

    Here we go again…

  • John Smith.

    It’s Kutako mate, you can’t be surprised by this kind of breach of ethics.

    • Sadly enough no, as they keep on doing it…

      • John Smith.

        You might as well start off every article about Kotak with the phrase. “Kotaku violates the rules of ethics once again by blablabla”

        Off topic, have you seen the virtue signaling rammed into the Wonder Boy remake? Now you can play as wonder girl, a female hore for for the first time… except for that girl from WBIII: Monsters Lair and sole playable character Asha from Monster World IV.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pUOJzNUdRE

        • “You might as well start off every article about Kotak with the phrase. “Kotaku violates the rules of ethics once again by blablabla”

          – It’s said but true, yes…

          “Off topic, have you seen the virtue signaling rammed into the Wonder Boy remake? Now you can play as wonder girl, a female hero for the first time… except for that girl from WBIII: Monsters Lair and sole playable character Asha from Monster World IV.”

          – It’s not the first time in the series, but the first time in Wonder Boy III. I have mixed emotions about it, because it “might” be a harmful feature. However, there might be more to it as well (I hope that I’m wrong though).

          • John Smith.

            I may have been too fast in judging the game, but it speaks volumes when my first reaction to news like this is “No, no more SJW BS in muh games”.
            I may need a break from gaming at this rate.

          • I guess that’s one of the reasons behind why more and more Gamers are importing Japanese games. I feel ya man…So hang in there!

  • andelbam

    LMAO, they should have put a disclaimer. Deleting comments if it hides the truth can only burn you in the pit even more. Guess, they haven’t learnt from their other controversial moments.

    • Correct, but they are well known for not doing that. So I just take it that they don’t care…

    • The problem here is the uninformed, normies and new gamers though. When they visit Kotaku (and they will because it’s mainstream) and see the Comments section, they won’t see the truth or any dissent because it’s been deleted/censored. Therefore they’ll go away thinking that Kotaku is the holy saint of gaming.

      That’s what deleting/censoring dissent does. It’s done to make people think that it’s the widely accepted opinion. SJWs/feminists do this all the time. And unfortunately, it works.

  • Kotaku and Ethics just don’t belong together..

    • Nope, and they’ve been like that for years…Furthermore, Kotaku doesn’t even bother when someone points that out for them.

Advertising spot

Help us stay alive

Paypal Patreon logo

Google ads (please turn off your adblock)

Advertisement

 

Play-Asia.com - Buy Games & Codes for PS4, PS3, Xbox 360, Xbox One, Wii U and PC / Mac.

 

 

Recent posts

Judas Priest just got their very own mobile game - Say hello to "Road To Valhalla"

Judas Priest just got their very own mobile game - Say hello to "Road To Valhalla"

I really love the fact that I was just listening to Judas Priest (Live in Miami 1988, to be exact) w[...]
Sudden Strike 4 gets reversible cover art by "Game of Thrones" artist

Sudden Strike 4 gets reversible cover art by "Game of Thrones" artist

Propaganda-inspired Artwork Designed by Renowned Artist Robert Simon Available for Sudden Strike 4 o[...]
NetherWorld - A very brutal and naughty upcoming 2D adventure game

NetherWorld - A very brutal and naughty upcoming 2D adventure game

I (Robin Ek, TGG) just found out about a truly promising and cool looking 2D adventure game called "[...]
Warframe's "Chains of Harrow" update is coming to PS4 and Xbox One today

Warframe's "Chains of Harrow" update is coming to PS4 and Xbox One today

Emerging from the Darkness, the Harrow Update Arrives With New Warframe, Quest, Weapons, Enemies, an[...]
The Banner Saga complete pack PS4 review - A neat fantasy tactical RPG that suffers from some rough edges

The Banner Saga complete pack PS4 review - A neat fantasy tactical RPG that suffers from some rough edges

"The Banner Saga" is the work of a team of ex-BioWare developers called Stoic, and although you migh[...]
No70: Eye of Basir PC review - A rather good first-person horror adventure/puzzle game

No70: Eye of Basir PC review - A rather good first-person horror adventure/puzzle game

Living in a haunted house may sound bad but being dragged into a supernatural investigation because [...]

Google ads

Our sponsors

Kinguin
EwinRacing Calling Series Gaming Chairs
TGG v2.4 © 2014 - 2017 *The Gaming Ground* all rights reserved
twitch icon youtube icon google plus icon twitter icon facebook icon rss icon
alexa
Privacy policy
TGG ethics policies